Formally-verified safety for multi-agent LLM pipelines. 0 / 1,210 INV-15 violations, Z3-proved in 10.08 ms. AMD MI300X-native.
Honest tools for the
AI agents that
write your code.
Six offline Rust binaries and one proof layer for AI coding agents. Search, guardrails, receipts, compliance, verification, signal. No cloud. No telemetry. No model downloads.
Two offline Rust binaries and one proof layer. EU AI Act Art. 12 L2 ready by default. Browse the toolkit →
The offline toolkit.
Six focused Rust binaries plus one proof layer. Each ships and stands alone.
Real-time signal & chain-of-custody for agent actions.
Open analyzerCommand-safety gate + seccomp / Landlock sandbox.
DocsOffline hybrid BM25 + vector MCP. One SQLite file.
DocsHMAC + Ed25519 + C2PA receipts. Tamper-evident provenance for every agent action.
DocsOWASP-A + NIST + ISO mapping. SARIF, CI-ready.
DocsEngineering positioning.
Criteria · design systems, isolate failures, define tests and audit decisions.
Honest level · start from zero with the tools, but familiar with informatics helps.
Depth · the included Python & JS course takes you further after.
The uncomfortable truth.
These numbers aren't ours. They come from people who actually measured.
of generative-AI initiatives in enterprise fail to deliver measurable return.
slower. What senior devs took longer with AI "acceleration" in a controlled study.
of agentic AI projects will be cancelled before 2028: cost and value unclear.
LLM risks exist for a reason: prompt injection, data leaks, over-permissioned agents.
The AI doesn't fail for lack of power. It fails for lack of criteria.
No magic. No marketing. Just tools that say what they do — and what they don't.
Apohara is built on one rule: claim only what the code can back. Every tool ships its benchmark, its threat model, and an honest scorecard of where it stops. Better to under-promise and let the code earn the trust.